Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24907 (GAU)

AKBAR ALI AHMED AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2987/2025 · 2025-12-17

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010282532025 2025:GAU-AS:17805 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2987/2025 AKBAR ALI AHMED AND 2 ORS. S/O. LATE TALEB UDDIN,R/O. KOIMARI PART - III, P.O. KOIMARI PART - III, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM. 2: ASMA BEGUM W/O AKBAR ALI AHMED R/O KOIMARI PART-III P.O. KOIMARI PART-III P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM 3: SOFIOR ALI AKAND @ SOFIOR RAHMAN S/O LATE JURAN ALI (MOHORI) R/O PASCHIM TUKRACHARA P.O. AND P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASASM PIN CODE-78333 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. I HUSSAIN, MS. M MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 18.12.2025 Heard Md I Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr B Page No.# 2/2 Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although this anticipatory bail application has been preferred, on a perusal of the FIR etc. it has been revealed that all the provisions mentioned in the FIR are bailable sections. Therefore, he has prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw this bail application, without any prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach appropriate forum with any other grievances, arising out of the FIR. 3. Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn, with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant