[2025:RJ-JP:32705] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11007/2025 Dr. Jagdish Prasad Mirdh S/o Shri Amra Ram Mirdh, Aged About 70 Years, R/o St. Anselum School Road, Laxmi Nagar, Nagaur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/08/2025 1. In this present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- "1. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the action of the respondents be declared illegal by which they are not granting the benefit of ACP on completion of 20 years service w.e.f. 07.09.2018. 2. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent be directed to grant benefit of ACP on completion of 20 years of service on 07.09.2018." [2025:RJ-JP:32705] (2 of 2) [CW-11007/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions of the client, submits that he would be satisfied if the petitioner is granted an opportunity to file a fresh representation narrating his grievances as encapsulated in the present writ petition before the respondent No.2-The Director, State Health and Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur, with a direction to decide the same expeditiously and in a time bound manner. 3. Heard. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.2-The Director, State Health and Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur, and respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner, by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order extending the period of limitation or an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 6. Other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /56