Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24902 (GAU)

BABBY BORO v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS.

WP(C)/884/2017 · 2025-12-09

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010122312017 2025:GAU-AS:17072 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/884/2017 BABBY BORO D/O. SRI TONKESWAR BORO @ TANGKESWAR BORO, R/O. VILL. LONFLONG, P.O. SONAPUR KAMALAJHARI, P.S. SONAPUR, DIST. KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM AND AT PRESENT RESIDING AT JANATA NAGAR, NOONMATI, P.O. and P.S. NOONMATI, GUWAHATI- 781020, C/O. HOUSE NO. 2, WARD NO. 23, GANESHMANDIR PATH, ASSAM, PHONE NO. 9957231881. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 4 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, DIST. KAMRUPM. 2:THE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM REP. BY THE SECRETARY BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI- 781021 DIST. KAMRUPM ASSAM HEREINAFTER CALLED 'SEBA'. 3:THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM GUWAHATI- 781021 DIST. KAMRUPM ASSAM. 4:THE SPIO Page No.# 2/2 BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM GUWAHATI- 781021 DIST. KAMRUPM ASSAM. 5:THE GOBARDHAN ANCHALIK HIGH SCHOOL AUTHORITY REP. BY THE HEAD MISTRESS and SECRETARY P.O.- CHOUDHURYKHAT CHHAYGAON DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.R K MALAKAR, MSK R SANKAR,MS.H KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SECONDARY EDUCATION, , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 10.12.2025 None appears for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Roy, learned Standing Counsel, ASSEB (earlier SEBA) appears for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed prayed for a direction for declaration of the result of the HSLC examination of the petitioner of the year 2010. Considering the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, which pertains to declaration of the result of HSLC of the year 2010, I am of the considered view that with the lapse of time, the matter might have become infructuous for which the petitioner seems to not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant