IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 82 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3585 OF 2024 RAVINDRA CHOTURAM PARDHI (MALE) AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. S.A. Gaikwad, APP for respondent No.1 ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER : . It appears that learned Advocate appearing for applicants has been discharged vide order dated 28.02.2025, however, nobody is appearing for applicants. While discharging the learned Advocate he had followed the proper procedure by sending notice to applicant No.1 under RPAD. In spite of receipt of said notice it appears that applicants have not made arrangement for the Advocate of their choice. Under such circumstance, application stands dismissed. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) agd 2025:BHC-AUG:26258-DB