Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24901 (CHH)

NAKUL KASHYAP v. Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation

WPS/4061/2025 · 2025-07-17

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:33923-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4061 of 2025 1 - Nakul Kashyap S/o Late Shri Bisouha Singh Aged About 61 Years R/o Harinagar Ward No. 59, Durg (C.G.) 2 - Deendayal Sahu S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village And Post - Singhola, Tahsil And District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 - Suryakant Soni S/o Late Shri Arabchand Soni Aged About 56 Years R/o Mandi Road Dargahan, Tahsil - Charma, District- Kanker (C.G.) 4 - Guddu Das Suryavanshi S/o Late Sakul Das Suryavanshi Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Bamhani, Tahsil And District- Kondagaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation Through Managing Director, Headquarter, Sector No. 24, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Personnel Manager Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation, 22 Anand Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary General Administration Department Mahanadi Bhavan Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Protection Department, Secretariate Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.07.21 18:13:17 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents No.1 and 2 For Respondents No.3 and 4 : : Mr.Anuroop Panda, Advocate Mr.Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 18.07.2025 1. Heard Mr.Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr.Anuroop Panda, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 & 2 and Mr.Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for respondents No.3 & 4. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly quash the impugned Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation (Class I, II, III, and IV) Service Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, 2021 order dated 20.06.2017 (ANNEXURE P/1) and the Order dated 14.05.2025 (ANNEXURE P/4) and pass the appropriate order in favour of the Petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to treat the service and promotion of the petitioners as per the earlier 3 circular and provide all the benefits to the petitioners which they have been deprived off, at the earliest, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh with appropriate prayers. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu