Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2490 (GAU)

THE CHAIRMAN BECHAMARI SAMABAI SAMITEE LTD v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/3707/2025 · 2026-02-19

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010020882024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3707/2025 THE CHAIRMAN BECHAMARI SAMABAI SAMITEE LTD REPRESENTED BY ABDUL SALAM AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS SON OF LATE ABDUL MAFIZ VILLAGE-MOIRADHAZ RAWMARI BILL P.O.- BECHAMARI P.S.- DHING DISTRICT- NAGAON ASSAM 2: THE SECRETARY BECHAMARI SAMABAI SAMITEE LTD REPRESENTED BY NAZRUL ISLAM AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS SON OF LATE ABDUL HAKIM. VILLAGE-BECHAMARI P.O- BECHAMARI P.S-DHING DISTRICT- NAGAON ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NAGAON ASSAM. PIN-782140. 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DHING REVENUE CIRCLE NAGAON ASSAM. PIN-782123. Page No.# 2/3 4:MD SAIDUL ISLAM SON OF LATE IDRISH ALI VILLAGE-BECHAMARI. P.O.- BECHAMARI. P.S.- DHING DISTRICT- NAGAON ASSAM. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. I. Khan, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. H. Sarmah, Addl. Sr. GA Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, Advocate Mr. T. Borkotoky, Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 20.02.2026 Heard Mr. N. I. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants. Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Revenue Department; Mr. H. Sarmah, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the District Administration and Mr. T. Borkotoky, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the opposite party No.4/petitioner. 2. The applicant Nos. 1 & 2 seek the leave of this Court to be arrayed in the accompanying writ petition, taking into account that the rights that any adjudication may have in respect of the said writ petition would affect their rights over the land in question. Page No.# 3/3 3. Mr. T. Borkotoky, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party No.4/petitioner submits that he has no objection. 4. Taking into account the above, the instant application stands allowed and the applicant Nos. 1 & 2 are arrayed as respondent Nos. 4 & 5 to the accompanying writ petition. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court, and the Registry, on the basis of the present order and the Memo of Parties, shall make necessary corrections in the cause title and update the same in the CIS. JUDGE Comparing Assistant