SRI NITYANANDA KAMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
WP(C)/6299/2025 · 2025-11-13
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24893 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24893 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010239232025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6299/2025 SRI NITYANANDA KAMAN R/O VILLAGE BILMUKH P O BILMUKH P S GHILAMARA DIST LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MORIGAON MORIGAON ASSAM 4:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE MORIGAON POLICE STATION P O AND P S MORIGAON DIST MORIGOAN 5:GRAMYA POULTRY PIGGERY GAUSALA BASNAGAT DIST MORIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B ISLAM, MR. J C GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 14.11.2025 Heard Mr. J.C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate for the State of Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4. It is noticed that an alternative remedy available to the petitioner under Rule 12[2] of the Assam Cattle Preservation Rules, 2022 read with Section 35[4] of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Rule 4[1] of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals [Care and Maintenance of Case Property Animals] Rules, 2017. Mr. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition in order to avail the above remedy. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Gogoi, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant