RAVI DUTT SHARMA S/O SHRI NAYAN SINGH SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6828/2022 · 2025-01-24
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24889 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24889 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3626] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No. 6828/2022 Ravi Dutt Sharma S/o Shri Nayan Singh Sharma, Aged About 75 Years, R/o 23, Shilp Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through PP
2. Mohammad Arif S/o Shri Mustaq Khan, R/o Aroda Market, Hasanpura, N.b.c Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Ranvijay Singh for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 24/01/2025
1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash and set aside the FIR No. 14/2006 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur for the offences under Sections 424, 467, 468, 120B, 471 & 474 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during investigation, the Police has come to the conclusion that the only offence under Sections 420, 406 & 120B of IPC is made out against the accused- petitioner, though, no charge-sheet has been filed so far. Counsel further submits that both the parties have entered into compromise and the offences punishable under Sections 420 & 406 are compoundable. Counsel also submits that in view of the fact that the parties have entered into compromise, no purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings arising
[2025:RJ-JP:3626] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6828/2022] from the impugned FIR because in such circumstances, there are bleak chances of conviction and it will only a burden on the Court proceedings.
3. Complainant- respondent No. 2 along with his counsel has put his personal presence before the Court and he does not dispute the fact of the complainant having entered into compromise. It is also submitted by the complainant that he does not want further proceedings in the impugned FIR lodged by him and further he has no objection if the FIR and proceedings arising from it, are quashed and set aside.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsels for both the parties and also perused the record as well as the written compromise between the parties, which has been filed along with the petition.
5. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsels for both the parties and also the fact that the parties have amicably settled their dispute, this Court deems just and proper to quash the FIR and consequential proceedings.
6. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the proceedings arising from FIR No.14/2006 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur are quashed and set aside.
7. Stay application and other application, if any, also stands
disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /311