Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24888 (GAU)

BIDYADHAR TANTI AND 6 ORS. v. NEERAJ MITTAL AND 5 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/490/2025 · 2025-12-04

Michael Zothankhuma, N Unni Krishnan Nair

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010198672025 2025:GAU- AS:16756-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/490/2025 BIDYADHAR TANTI AND 6 ORS. S/O- LATE BHARATI TANTI, P.O AND P.S- MAHADEVPUR, DIST- LOHIT, ARUNACHAL PRADESH 2: JADAV SAIKIA S/O- SHRI T .SAIKIA P.O- DEOTALA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 3: SUNIL KUMAR S/O- SHRI D. RAY P.O- LAKHANI P.S- BIDUPUR BAZAR DIST- VAISHALI BIHAR 4: GOPI CHAND S/O- SHRI G. RAJPUT P.O- KHANPUR DIST- KANPUR UTTAR PRADESH 5: ANIL KUMAR ROY S/O- LATE B.N RAI P.O- CHANDOLI DIST- SAMASTIPUR BIHAR 6: KEISHAM PRADIP SINGHA S/O- LATE BABU SINGHA P.O- LANKA DIST- NAGAON Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 7: BIDYOT HAZARIKA S/O- SABESWAR HAZARIKA P.O- BORDOLINI DIST- DHEMAJI ASSA VERSUS NEERAJ MITTAL AND 5 ORS. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION, SANCHAR BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-1 2:SRHI A. ROBERT J. RAVI CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED SANCHAR BHAWAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI-1. 3:KESHAV KUMAR DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL (ESTT.) CORPORATE OFFICE BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED B-102 STATESMAN HOUSE NEW DELHI-1 4:SAKET KUMAR VERMA CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED NORTH EAST TELECOM CIRCLE-II DIMAPUR NAGALAND-797112 5:NAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED NORTH EAST TELECOM CIRCLE-II DIMAPUR NAGALAND-797112 6:SAKET VERMA GENERAL MANAGER BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED ARUNACHAL PRADESH SECONDARY SWITCHING AREAS (SSA) ITANAGAR-79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M NATH, MAUSAM NATH,MR U GHOSH,MR. A Page No.# 3/3 BHATTACHARJEE,MR. D P BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 05/12/2025 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Mr. D.P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press this contempt petition any further in view of the fact that there has been substantial compliance of the order of this Court. In view of the submission made by Mr. D.P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition stands closed, as not pressed. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant