Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24882 (AP)

VALLEPU NAGA RAJU v. Sri G.Satya Prabhakar Rao, IAS,

CC/3610/2024 · 2025-09-03

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010351952023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3489] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3610/2024 Between: 1. VALLEPU NAGA RAJU, S/O. V. SIVANNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, GUNTUR, ON DEPUTATION TO XI ADDL. DIST. JUDGES COURT, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. S. DANIEL PRABHAKAR, S/O S. B. SADGUNA RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, III ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, KAINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. ANGAJALA ARUNA, D/O A. KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. M. DANIEL, S/O M. PRASADU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. D. PRASANNA LAKSHMI,, D/O D. CHANDRA SEKHARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. AKULA SUBRAHMANYAM,, S/O A. SAMBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. B.G.CHANDRA PRASAD VARMA,, S/O B. CHANDRA SEKHAR 2 VARMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, III ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. M. JABEED ALI,, S/O M. ABBAS, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, ANANTHAPURAMU. 9. K. SHYAM KUMAR REDDY, S/O K.JAYARAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, KADAPA DISTRICT. 10. KOMARAPU SUNIL,, S/O. K. SOLOMON RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. COMPUTER ASSISTANT, PRI. DISTRICT COURT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI G SATYA PRABHAKAR RAO IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SMT V SUNITHA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to permit the petitioners to implead the Proposed Respondents No.3 and 4 as the Party Respondent No.3 and 4 to the C.C. S.R.No. 28437 of 2023 in W.P. No. 3129 of 2021 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioners herein to make the proposed Respondent No.2 as a party respondent to the present Contempt Case filed seeking to summon the respondents for committing contempt of order dated 04-08-2022 in WP.No. 3129 of 2021 passed by Honourable Sri Justice A.V.Seshasai and Honourable Sri Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioners to implead the Proposed Respondents No.3 and 4 as the Party Respondent No.3 and 4 to the C.C. S.R.No. 28437 of 2023 in W.P. No. 3129 of 2021 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MANOJ KUMAR BETHAPUDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU 2. G V S KISHORE KUMAR 3. 4 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Order of this Court, dated 04.08.2022 in W.P.No.3129 of 2021 has been complied with. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. _____________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J. BSM 5 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3610/2024 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Date: 04.09.2025 BSM