Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24879 (CHH)

VIKAS PAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

CRMP/1217/2020 · 2025-07-23

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:35683-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1217 of 2020 1 Vikas Pal S/o Late Dhansai Pal Aged About 39 Years R/o Ward No. 5, Chikhli, Police Chowki - Chikhli, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 Vijay Pal S/o Late Dhansai Pal, Aged About 31 Years R/o Ward No. 5, Chikhli, Police Chowki - Chikhli, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 Smt. Dulari Bai Pal W/o Late Dhansai Pal, Aged About 65 Years R/o Ward No. 5, Chikhli, Police Chowki - Chikhli, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Station House Officer, Police Station - Ghumka, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 Smt. Sharda Pal W/o Vikas Pal, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village - Gopalpur, Police Station - Ghumka, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.07.25 10:36:28 +0530 2 / 2 For Petitioner : None For Respondents : Shri Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, (Chief Justice) 24.07.2025 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls. 2. In view of the same, it appears that petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 3. At this juncture, learned State counsel submits that the case is fixed for evidence on 25.09.2025. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti/ $ Bhilwar