Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010267622025 2025:GAU-AS:17560 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2883/2025 JAKIR HUSSAIN AND 2 ORS. S/O ABDUL JOBBAR R/O VILL- SHERPUR PT.II P.S. PATHARKANDI DIST. SRIBHUMI ASSAM 2: SALIKUR RAHMAN @ ABDUL SALIK SON OF LATE FORJAN ALI R/O VILL- SHERPUR PT.II P.S. PATHARKANDI DIST. SRIBHUMI ASSAM 3: JUBER AHMED @ JUBAIR AHMED S/O LATE SALIKUR RAHMAN @ ABDUL SALIK R/O VILL- SHERPUR PT.II P.S. PATHARKANDI DIST. SRIBHUMI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR K BHUYAN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 17.12.2025 Heard Mr. K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners, namely, Jakir Hussain, Salikur Rahman @ Abdul Salik and Juber Ahmed @ Jubair Ahmed, have prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Patharkandi P.S. Case No. 230/2025 under Section 117(2)/118(2)/126(2)/109/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The gist of the allegation in the FIR dated 14.10.2025 is that the accused persons named in the FIR assaulted the informant with iron stick and also robbed some significant amount of money apart from breaking his mobile phone. It is also alleged they attacked his family members causing injuries to his father and others. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to same incident, a cross FIR was lodged from the side of the petitioners in which the informant is one of the accused and said cross FIR was registered into Patharkandi P.S. Case No. 230/2025. 5. Both the case diaries were called for but the case diary only Patharkandi P.S. Case No. 229/2025 is received. Page No.# 3/3 6. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is revealed implication against the accused with regard to allegation and lends supports and on the basis of medical report available in the case diary, it is submitted that the incident led to grievous injuries one victim and other injuries are of simple in nature in another victim. 7. In view of the incriminating materials revealed by the investigation and the injuries purportedly caused in the alleged incident - I am of the considered view that – it may not be prudent to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the pre-arrest bail stands rejected at this stage and the petition disposed of accordingly. 8. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant