$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2794/2024 HARISH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar and Mr. Prashant Rana, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP SI Avinash Kumar, P.S. Anand Vihar. Mr. Rajiv Raheja, Adv. for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R % 18.03.2025 1. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has instruction to withdraw the application and, therefore, the anticipatory bail application be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. The learned counsel for complainant submits that applicant made false statement in his bail application in Para no.14 that he was ready to settle the matter with the complainant and, therefore, needed time to refund the entire settlement amount of the complainant. 3. The order dated 20.09.2024 also reveals that petitioner has expressed his willingness to pay Rs. 23 Lakhs to the complainant but he has not paid a single penny to the complainant. 4. The conduct of the petitioner as pointed out by the learned counsel for This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2025 at 12:30:32 the petitioner is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. RAVINDER DUDEJA, J MARCH 18, 2025/sky This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2025 at 12:30:32