[2025:RJ-JP:28025] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11041/2025 1. Manish Kumar Vyas S/o Umesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Near Bus Stand, Wazirpur, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 2. Rahul Kumar Sharma S/o Ramgopal Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ward No. 9, Amritpuri Colony, Hindauncity, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 3. Prashant Solanki S/o Kamal Singh Solanki, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Ekolasi, Jatnangla, Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Karauli 4. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Block Hindauncity, District Karauli. 5. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Block Todabhim, District Karauli. 6. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Block Sapotara, District Karauli 7. The District Collector, Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 25/07/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:28025] (2 of 3) [CW-11041/2025] Although, in the writ petition, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to continue services of the petitioner, a Pharmacist appointed on urgent temporary basis; but, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contended if he is permitted to submit a representation with the respondents to consider his case in the light of an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil [2025:RJ-JP:28025] (3 of 3) [CW-11041/2025] Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- “(i) The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. (ii) The respondents are directed to consider the representation within a period of twelve weeks from the date of its receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra).” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/24