IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14324/2025 a/w connected matters Decided on: 08.09.2025 1. CWP No.14324/2025 Neelma Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No.14326/2025 Sushma Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 3. CWP No.14328/2025 Bhawna Dhiman & Anr. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 4. CWP No.14330/2025 Arti Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 5. CWP No.14332/2025 Kewal Krishan & Anr. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 6. CWP No.14390/2025 Babita Rangra …Petitioner Versus 2 State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Anita Devi, Advocate in all the matters. For the respondents): Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate Generl with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General in all the matters. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024 3 of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Mohit Sharma2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 08th September, 2025(rohit)