DILEEP KUMAR MANGAVA S/O SHRI RAM LAL MANGAVA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/10987/2025 · 2025-08-14
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24862 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24862 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31726] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10987/2025 Dileep Kumar Mangava S/o Shri Ram Lal Mangava, Age About 29 Years, R/o Ward No-30, Dhani Mangava Ki Village Mandusya Post Ajeetgrah Tehsil Shrimadhopur District Sikar Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Secrectrate Jaipur Rajasthan
2. The Director General Of Police Rajasthan Police, Lal Kothi Police Head Quarter Jaipur Rajasthan 302015
3. The Police Commissioner, Rajasthan Police Government Hostel C-Scheme Jaipur Rajasthan 302001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 14/08/2025 Although, a prayer made in the writ petition for grant of notional fixation from the date of appointment; but, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contented if this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to him to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) who may be directed to decide the same expeditiously. In view of the nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.:
[2025:RJ-JP:31726] (2 of 2) [CW-10987/2025] SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is
disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:-
“(i) The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. (ii) The respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of its receipt with communication of the decision to the petitioner.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/22