FAUJA SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/6121/2020 · 2025-03-19
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24860 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24860 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-6121-2020 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 305 CWP-6121-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision :19.03.2025
Fauja Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus State of Punjab & others ..Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Malkiat Singh, DAG, Punjab with Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in the present petition, has already been decided by this Court while passing
order in CWP-19425-2017 titled as Sikander Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, decided on 10.02.2025 and prays that the present petition may kindly be disposed of in terms of the said order.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to dispute the fact that the only claim of the petitioners in the present petition is that the services rendered by the petitioners on daily wage/adhoc/work charge basis be taken into account as qualifying service for computing their pensionary benefits, which issue has already been decided by this Court while passing order in the case of Sikander Singh (supra).
3. Keeping in view the said fact, present petition is also disposed AARTI SHARMA 2025.03.21 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-6121-2020 (O&M) -2- of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Sikander Singh (supra).
13. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also
disposed of. March 19, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.03.21 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document