Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2486 (GAU)

EBRAHIM SK AND 4 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2900/2025 · 2026-01-20

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010271282025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2900/2025 EBRAHIM SK AND 4 ORS. S/O LATE CHANULLAH SK., R/O VILL- AIRONJONGLA PART-III, P.S. AND DIST- DHUBRI (ASSAM) 2: ABDUL LATIF PRODHANI S/O GOLAP RABBANI PRODHANI R/O VILL- AIRONJONGLA PART-III P.S. AND DIST- DHUBRI (ASSAM) 3: AMINA BIBI @ ANNA BEGUM W/O ABDUL LATIF PRODHANI R/O VILL- AIRONJONGLA PART-III P.S. AND DIST- DHUBRI (ASSAM) 4: SAJIDA KHATUN D/O LATE CHANULLAH SK R/O VILL- AIRONJONGLA PART-III P.S. AND DIST- DHUBRI (ASSAM) 5: NOZIMON KHATUN @ NOZIMAN BEWA W/O LATE CHANMULLA SK. R/O VILL- AIRONJONGLA PART-III P.S. AND DIST- DHUBRI (ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A T SARKAR, S R DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 21.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. T. Sarkar, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent, who submits that the though the case diary was called for in this case, however, in the meanwhile, the charge-sheet has been laid bearing the Charge-sheet No. 418/2025 dated 17.12.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners, namely, (i) Ebrahim Sk. @ Kanchu (ii) Abdul Latif Prodhani (ii) Amina Bibi @ Anna Begum (iv) Sajida Khatun and (v) Nozimon Khatun @ Noziman Bewa, were granted interim bail by this Court by its order dated 09.12.2025 and they have co-operated in the investigation and are ready and willing to cooperate in the trial too. 3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the materials available on record. 4. Since, the charge has been laid and since the petitioners who are on interim bail have co-operated in the investigation, the interim bail granted to the above named petitioners by order dated 09.12.2025 by this Court is hereby made absolute with the condition No. (b) (c) (d) and (e) attached to the said order remaining intact. 5. This anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant