IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 641 of 2024 Decided on: 11.03.2025 Lehar Singh. .…Petitioner. Versus Tilak Raj and Ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 11th March, 2025 Judge (sushma)