Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010096342025 2025:GAU-AS:17057 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2519/2025 DILNAWAZ AKTAR CHOUDHURY D/O- LATE ABU HANIF CHOUDHURY, VILL.- SIBNARAINPUR, P.O. SIALTEK, P.S. KATIGORAH, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788802. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HAILAKANDI DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151. 5:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC) FOR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CASE FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND HAILAKANDI REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/4 HAILAKANDI DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788151 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H A LASKAR, MS D DUTTA,A. H. AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 10-12-2025 Heard Mr. H. A. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. C. Chutia, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents. 2. The petitioner, by filing this writ petition, has challenged the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024, passed by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Personnel (B) Department, whereby, the Government’s existing policy/scheme of providing appointment to a family member of a Government servant on compassionate ground has been done away with, in complete suppression of the earlier OMs, notifications and policy/scheme relating to compassionate appointments, thereby, providing compassionate family pension in lieu of compassionate appointment. 3. The father of the petitioner, Late Abu Hanif Choudhury, died in harness on 17.02.2012 while serving as an Assistant Sub-Inspector (A.S.I.) of Police under the Superintendent of Police, Hailakandi, Assam. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that she had submitted an application Page No.# 3/4 on 23.07.2012 under the Government’s policy/scheme for appointment on compassionate grounds. Aggrieved by the non-consideration of her application, she approached this Court by way of filing Writ Petition being WP(C) No. 1835/2024, which was subsequently withdrawn with liberty to challenge the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024. While her application was pending consideration by the respondent authorities, the issuance of the impugned Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 has adversely affected her right to be considered for appointment on compassionate grounds under the existing scheme. 5. It is stated at the Bar that this Court, in a batch of writ petitions, the leading case being Abdul Kadir Bokshi vs. The State of Assam & Ors., in WP(C) No. 342/2025, vide order dated 03.04.2025, directed that the applications for compassionate appointment of petitioners who had challenged the Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024 and whose cases were pending before this Court as on 03.04.2025, be considered and disposed of on merit, taking into account the various guidelines in force prior to 01.04.2017. Pursuant thereto, the respondent authorities issued an Executive Order dated 30.08.2025, seeking applications and relevant documents from the persons whose cases are pending. 6. Mr. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in terms of the Executive Order seeking applications and relevant documents, the petitioner has duly submitted her application for appointment on compassionate grounds on 15.09.2025, during the pendency of this writ petition. 7. Mr. T. C. Chutia, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the respondents, submits that the case of the petitioner cannot be Page No.# 4/4 considered as she has filed the present Writ Petition after 03.04.2025 and this Court has clearly held in Abdul Kadir Bokshi (supra) that only cases which were pending before this Court as on 03.04.2025 should be considered. 8. Having considered that, pursuant to the order of this Court in Abdul Kadir Bokshi (supra), the respondent authorities in the Department of Personnel, Personnel (B), Dispur, Guwahati, issued an Executive Order dated 30.08.2025, seeking applications and requisite documents from all persons whose cases are pending consideration for appointment on compassionate ground, in terms of which, the petitioner has stated to have submitted the documents as sought by the respondent authorities, I am of the considered view that no issue remains to be considered in this proceedings. 9. Accordingly, in view of the above and as agreed to by the learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition stands closed and disposed of. 10. It is needless to observe that, since the petitioner has submitted her application and the requisite documents as sought by the respondent authorities, same would be considered in accordance with law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant