Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24846 (MAD)

M/s Kondaduvom Entertainment v. Shraddha Entertainment

A/667/2025 · 2025-02-17

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No.667 of 2025 Application No.667 of 2025 in O.A.No.225 of 2020 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. M/s.Kondaduvom Entertainment, Chennai. and others .. Applicants Vs. M/s.Shraddha Entertainment, Chennai. and another. .. Respondents This application has been filed seeking extension of time for the Arbitrator to pronounce the arbitral award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents has stated no objection for allowing this application. It is represented by both the counsels that before the Arbitrator, it is in the final stage of arguments. 3. This Court is also satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit filed in support of this application, as sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant seeking extension of time for the Arbitrator to pronounce the arbitral award. Accordingly, this application is allowed as 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No.667 of 2025 prayed for by grating extension of time for the Arbitrator to pronounce the arbitral award by another period of six months from today. 17.02.2025 rkm 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No.667 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. rkm Application No.667 of 2025 in O.A.No.225 of 2020 17.02.2025 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis