Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:2147 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 15864 of 2024 Decided on : 09.01.2025 Tajender Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, without making any observation on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let the representation (Annexure P-2), filed by the petitioner, be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein as well as judgment, if any, being 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:2147 relied upon by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. The issue of delay and latches can be gone into, by the Authority concerned. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
January 09, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)