Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24841 (CHH)

Khemprasad v. Ghasiram and others

SA/55/2016 · 2025-08-12

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40693 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 55 of 2016 1. Khemprasad S/o Jai Ram Saw, Aged About 82 Years Occupation Farmer, R/o Village Tarkela, Police Station Raigarh, Tahsil Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ............Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1. Ghasiram And Others S/o Hriday Ram, R/o Village Tarkela, Police Station Raigarh, Tahsil Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Sahakari Vipdan Maryadit, Patthalgaon, Near S.D.M. Bungalow, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2. Land Acquisition Officer, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Village Tarkela, Tahsil Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3. Power Grade Corporation Of India Limited, Tarkela, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ..........Defendants, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Kunal Das, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.08.18 11:49:16 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Judgment on Board 13.08.2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as per the information received, the appellant has expired and no legal representative of the appellant is available to prosecute the appeal. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant that no legal representative of the appellant is available to continue the appeal, the instant Second Appeal is abated on account of death of the appellant. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated. However, liberty is reserved to the legal heirs of the appellant to revive the second appeal if exigency so arise. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish