[2025:RJ-JP:39545] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9174/2025 Sukhdev Singh S/o Shri Bhairu Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Khajpura, Police Station Adarsh Nagar, Ajmer. (At Present Con- fined In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 25/09/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.18/2022 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) for offence punishable under Sections 420 & 120B of IPC. Investigation is being conducted against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that offences are based on documents which have already been recovered by the investigating agency. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Counsel submits that there is one criminal antecedents of the petitioner for the offences punishable [2025:RJ-JP:39545] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9174/2025] under Sections 323, 341, 427 & 34 of IPC wherein he is on bail. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; offences are based on documents which have been recovered by the investigating agency and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Sukhdev Singh S/o Shri Bhairu Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve [2025:RJ-JP:39545] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9174/2025] in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail. 8. If any breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 9. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /94