1 ca 15303.23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 106 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15303 OF 2023 IN SAST/23082/2023 Dilip Bansilal Gugale And Anr. VERSUS Chhaban Shivram Thate (deceased) Thr. Lrs. Pandit Chavan Tathe And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R.S. Kasar Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Y.V. Kakde CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : February 07, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Mr. Kasar, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that he has filed a purshis dated 06.12.2024 seeking permission to delete respondent no.1C, 2 and 3 from the array of the respondents in the present civil application. According to him, they are not necessary parties for adjudication of the dispute. He submits that even he would delete them in the second appeal. Considering contents of the purshis dated 6.12.2024 permission is granted to delete respondent no.1C, 2 and 3 at the risk of the applicant/appellant. Amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today. 2. The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 100 days caused in filing the second appeal. 3. Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties. 2025:BHC-AUG:3756 2 ca 15303.23.odt 4. Considering the reasons as stated in paragraph nos.5 and 6, case is made out to condone the delay. 5. In the result, the application is allowed. Delay of 100 days caused in filing the second appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered on removal of office objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) … aaa-