1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14204 of 2025 Date of decision: 03.09.2025 Kalpna Pundir & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representation dated 21.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) seeking applicability of the decision rendered in Yashwant Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others1, has not been decided till date. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the 1CWP No.8148 of 2022, decided on 21.03.2024 decided along with connected matters. -2- petitioners would be content, if the cases of the petitioners are considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions and without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at, shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 3rd September, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)