APHC010351432020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23357/2020 Between: 1. M RATNAMMA, D/O. VISAKHA, AGE 72 R/O. H.NO. 5- 119ADIGOPPULA VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, ARNAR-AVATI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DURGI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 4. N APPAIAH, SIRE, LATELTAIA.H, AGE NOT KNOWN, R/O. ADIGOPPULA VILLAGE, DURGI MIMDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, .. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not taking action for bind over against the 4th respondent against his illegal and high handed action in pursuance of the representation dated 21-08-2020 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2na Respondent to dispose of representation dated 21- 08- 2020 for consideration of bind over issue against 4th respondent from interfering with the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:23357 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not taking action for bind over against the 4th respondent against his illegal and high handed action in pursuance of the representation dated 21-08-2020 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and pass…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. None represented for the petitioner. 3. As seen from the material available on record, it is a case where the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent-Police to take appropriate action against the respondent No.4, in pursuance to the representation dated 21.08.2020, made by the petitioner. 4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, has requested this Court to pass appropriate orders by giving a direction to the respondent- Police. 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to look into the representation dated 21.08.2020, made by the petitioner and take appropriate decision in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.08.2025. SRT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23357 of 2020 Dated.18.08.2025 SRT 126