1 APHC010351052018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16315/2018 Between: K. Balamaddileti ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16315/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the final orders vide Rc. No. 27/2017/APE(DWMA)-DWMAKRNL dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 4th respondent in terminating the petitioner from services of Field Assistant of Jillela Village, Gospadu Mandal, Kurnool District without considering the explanation offered by the petitioner and without conducting any enquiry is illegal and arbitrary and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass…” 2. Heard Sri N.Aswartha Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj on behalf of the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner preferred an appeal against the impugned order before the District Collector which was rejected vide Orders dated 05.09.2018, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner in reply, would submit that the petition may be disposed of in the light of the submission made by the learned Standing counsel, giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the District Collector rejecting the appeal. 3 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the orders passed by the District Collector rejecting the appeal, if so advised. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 11.03.2025 UPS 4 38 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16315 of 2018 Dated.11.03.2025 UPS