IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14259 of 2025 Date of Decision: 4.9.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Attro Devi and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners’ case is squarely covered by the judgment dated 2.5.2012, passed by coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 7602 of 2010, titled Om Parkash v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. (alongwith connected matters) and as such, she would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide their representation (Annexure P-3) in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states - 2 - that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners in light of Om Parkash (supra) expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. September 4, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge