[2025:RJ-JP:37363] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8084/2025 Rachana Wife Of Khushiram D/o Kalluram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kariri P.s. Todabheem, District Karauli (Raj.) Presently Residing At Machyaan Ka Pura, P.s. Mahuwa District Dausa (Raj.) (Accused Is Presently Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9374/2025 Smt. Imarti W/o Kalluram, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Kariri, Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli ( Rajasthan) ( Accused Confined In Sub Jail Hindauncity) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10826/2025 Kalluram S/o Mithalal, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Kariri, Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Accused Confined In Sub Jail, Hindauncity) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Avasthi Mr. Mohd. Rahil Kalam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order [2025:RJ-JP:37363] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8084/2025] 15/09/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 59/2025 registered at Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 193(3), 190, 103(2) and 333 of BNS. 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that specific allegations of attributing injuries to the deceased Vijay Singh is against co-accused Pradyuman. It is further contended that the petitioners are close family members of the deceased and occurrence took place without any premeditation. The petitioners have not caused any injury to the deceased, petitioners Rachna and Imarti are women and charge- sheet against them have already been submitted before the concerned court. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, considering the above facts, these bail applications of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed these bail applications. It is contended that as per the prosecution story petitioners alongwith the co-accused Pradyuman, forcefully entered into the house of the deceased and thereafter with a common intention caused injuries to deceased which resulted into his death. Other eye witnesses injured Rishikesh and Anita also sustained injuries. It is [2025:RJ-JP:37363] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8084/2025] further contended that in the postmortem report cause of death of deceased was shown as excessive bleeding and due to sharp complete cut in both femoral artery and femoral vein, therefore considering the above facts, these bail applications of the accused- petitioners deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, considering the allegations levelled against the petitioners and injuries caused to the deceased Vijay Singh and other eye witnesses Rishikesh and Anita, this court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners are hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /69-71