APHC010351872018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16312/2018 Between: 1. SUBBA LAKSHMI PARAMATA, W/O SAHEBU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC.COOK, R/O RAMANAIAH COLONY AMBEDKAR NAGAR, I.POLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI, KAKINADA. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINDA. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GEDDAM SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to attend the interview for the post of Cook, Kamati, Office Subordinate, pursuant to the notification No. 1/2018 dt.7-3-2018 without taking into considering her services as cook from the year, 2009 on contract/outsourcing basis as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to attend the interview by duly considering her past service and consider the candidate of the 2 petitioner for appointment to the post of Cook/Kamati/Office Subordinate.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I would submit that the Respondents-Authorities have complied with the interim order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 dated 02.05.2018. In the light of the compliance of the said order, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri G.Satish Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16312 of 2018 Dt.07.03.2025 Dinesh