APHC010351522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7393/2025 Between: 1. KANKIPATI ANANDA RAJU, S/O.LATE RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC LABOUR, R/O.D.NO.19-8-48/13, OLD RAJARAJESWARI PETA, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, VIJAYAWADA URBAN. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P AT AMARAVATI. 2. KANKIPATI SUVARNAMMA, W/O.ANANDA RAJU AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.19-8-48/13, OLD RAJARAJESWARI PETA, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, VIJAYAWADA CITY. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to C.C No.71/2025, dt.03.06.2025 in Crime No.475/2024, dt.10.11.2024 on the file of the II Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate court at Vijayawada and Quash the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings C.C No.71/2025, dt.03.06.2025 in Crime No.475/2024, dt.10.11.2024 on the file of the II Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate court at Vijayawada and Quash the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. MANDA VENKATESWARA RAO 2 Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Following Order: The instant petition under Section 528 of the BNSS has been filed by the petitioner herein/Accused No.1, seeking quashment of proceedings against him in C.C.No.71 of 2025 on the file of the Court of II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vijayawada, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 115(2), 118(1) and 79 read with 3(5) of BNS. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner before the trial Court. 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that there is verifiable material placed on record through the charge sheet, hence it is not a fit case for quashment. 4. Considering the submissions made, the petition is disposed of, without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner before the trial Court. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date : 17.07.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.7393 of 2025 Dt.17.07.2025 ASR