Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24810 (HP)

NARINDER KUMAR NAG v. THE CSKHPKV

CWP/15082/2024 · 2025-01-07

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15082 of 2024 Decided on: 7th January, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Narinder Kumar Nag …..Petitioner Versus Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Radhey Shyam Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Janesh Mahajan, learned Standing Counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Prayer in this petition is to include Secretariat pay as part of the Basic Pay for computing pension and other retiral benefits. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Single Bench of this 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Court in Durga Ram Vs. Himachal Pradesh University & Anr.2. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondent/ competent authority is directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment in a time bound manner. Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondent. 5. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent/competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and in case the petitioner is found to be similarly situated, then the benefit extended to the petitioner in the aforesaid judgment, shall also be extended to the petitioner in the instant case also. The entire exercise be completed within six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 07, 2025 Judge Mukesh 2 CWPOA No.208 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 18.10.2022