Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010182772025 2025:GAU-AS:14576 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/144/2025 PANKAJ SANITATION AND ANR (BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI PRAMOD BHAGAT), A R/O PATHARQUARY, V.I.P. ROAD, KAMRUP (M), NARENGI-781026, GUWAHATI, ASSAM 2: PRAMOD BHAGAT PROPRIETOR OF PANKAJ SANITATION R/O PATHARQUARY V.I.P. ROAD KAMRUP (M) NARENGI-781026 GUWAHATI ASSA VERSUS SHREE TIMBER PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS. A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY AS SUCH BEING REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTOR/AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI PRABHJOT SINGH HUNDEL 2:PRABHJOT SINGH HUNDEL S/O SRI AMARJEET SINGH HUNDEL R/O MAKUM INDUSTRIAL AREA-II TINGRAI BENGALI GAON P.O. AND P.S.- MAKUM JN.- 786170 DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM 3:SMT. RANJEET KAUR D/O TARA SINGH R/O MAKUM INDUSTRIAL AREA-II TINGRAI BENGALI GAON P.O. AND P.S.- MAKUM JN.- 786170 Page No.# 2/3 DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM 4:RAMESH KUMAR SABOO S/O RAM BALLABH SABOO R/O MAKUM INDUSTRIAL AREA-II TINGRAI BENGALI GAON P.O. AND P.S.- MAKUM JN.- 786170 DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:AMARJEET SINGH HUNDAL S/O SRI AVATAR SINGH R/O MAKUM INDUSTRIAL AREA-II TINGRAI BENGALI GAON P.O. AND P.S.- MAKUM JN.- 786170 DIST- TINSUKIA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA, MR. H DAS,MR. B SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR B KAUSHIK, K BHARALI,MS A M DCOSTA,MR. S HAZARIKA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 30.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Mr. Kaushik has submitted that in this matter an Appeal lies and no application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable. Therefore, he will file an Appeal. 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that till the Page No.# 3/3 respondents file the Appeal, no course of action should be taken against the petitioners in the connected execution proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has objected to it. 5. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides. 6. It is hereby directed that no course of action should be taken against the present petitioners in respect of the connected execution proceedings. 7. The petitioners shall file the Appeal within the next 15 (fifteen) days. 8. With the aforesaid direction, this Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant