Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24802 (CHH)

NARENDRA SINGH VERMA, v. VIJAY JANGDE,

WPC/2249/2020 · 2025-04-03

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15753 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2249 of 2020 1 - Narendra Singh Verma, S/o Late Shri Chungu Verma, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village - Jhitiya, Post - Faradfod, Tehsil - Dondilohara, Police Station - Suregaon, District - Balod, Chhattisgarh. Presently Working As Sarpanch Gram Panchayat - Jhitiya, Tehsil - Dondilohara, Police Station - Suregaon, District - Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Vijay Jangde, S/o Late Shri Gwal Jangde, Aged About 50 Years, 2 - Devadas, S/o Late Shri Sukalu Ram Gaikwad, Aged About 30 Years Both 1 & 2 are R/o Village / Gran Panchayat - Jhitiya, Tehsil - Dondilohara, District - Balod, (C.G.) 3 - Chhannu Lal Deshlahare, S/o Shri Devprasad, Aged About 30 Years Caste - Satnami, 4 - Dhalchandra Joshi, S/o Late Shri Hariram, Aged About 50 Years, Both 3 & 4 are R/o - Village - Godmarra, Gran Panchayat - Jhitiya, Tehsil - Dondilohara, District – Balod (C.G.) 5 - Returning Officer (Panchayat Election) Poling Centre No. 79, Gram Panchayat - Jhitiya, Block / Tehsil - Dondilohara, District - Balod, (C.G.) 6 - Presiding Officer (Panchayat Election) Poling Centre No. - 80, Gram Panchayat - Jhitiya, Block / Tehsil - Dondilohara, District - Balod, (C.G.) 7 - Presiding Officer ( Panchayat Election) Poling Centre No. - 81, Gram Panchayat - Jhitiya, Block / Tehsil - Dondilohara, District - Balod, (C.G.) 8 - Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue), Dondilohara, District - Balod, (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None. For the State/Respondents No. 5 to 8 : Shri Sachchidanand Yadav, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No.1 to 4 : None, though served. NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.04.04 10:37:25 +0530 2 Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board 03/04/2025 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, though the matter has been called since yesterday. 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this petition for non- prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Kamde