CRM-M-67950- IN THE H (236) NARENDER @ G STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. MANISHA BATR 1. The p Section 483 of Bh for grant of regul registered under Bharatiya Nyaya S NIT Faridabad, Di 2. The submitted by the that he wanted to from Faridabad to one VRL Logistic of the Company quotation of Rs.8, his car which was -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH R @ GOLU Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh regular bail in case arising out of F nder Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3 yaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS” ad, District Faridabad. The aforementioned FIR was register y the complainant Maruti Mishra on ted to transport his vehicle bearing bad to Raipur. He had sought online q ogistics which was a known company. pany whose number was disclosed o Rs.8,000/- plus tax plus and insuranc h was declared as Rs.1 lakh. On 18. JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-67950-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 02.02.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent
ANISHA BATRA
for the petitioner aryana preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) ut of FIR No.196 dated 05.08.2025 3), 340(2), 61(2) and 238 of ”) at Police Station Cyber Crime egistered on the basis of a complaint hra on 29.07.2025, alleging therein aring registration No.SK-01-P-5609 nline quotations and got quotation of pany. He called the contact person osed on the website and was given surance @ 5% on declared value of n 18.07.2025, a Driver was sent by M) 2026 nder ) 2025 f rime laint erein 5609 on of rson iven ue of nt by AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.03 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-67950- the company for contact person of i.e. the quotation insurance amount paid an amount o received a call fr reached at Madhy Rs.32,000/- it was mail to the head o he had been dup registration of FIR Sharma was arrest basis of which th already in custody production warran statement admittin belonging to the co his disclosure state presented. 3. It is a falsely implicated accused. A false and Nishant have parity, he too des -2025 (O&M) 2 y for transportation of his vehicle. on of the VRL Logistic, he had transf tation amount and had deposited ano mount which was assured to be refun ount of Rs.19,000 and Rs.13,000 resp call from the same person who wh Madhya Pradesh border and told hi it was on account of RTO challan. F head office of M/s. VRL Logistics C n duped of amount of Rs.45,0008/ of FIR, investigation proceedings wer arrested on 31.08.2025. He suffered ich the present petitioner was nomin ustody in some other case. His presen warrants on 03.09.2025. On interrogat dmitting his involvement in the crim the complainant. Another accused w statement. Investigation now stands It is argued by learned counsel for t licated in this case on the basis of di false recovery has been planted upo have already been extended benefit o oo deserves the benefit of bail. He e. On 21.07.2025, on asking of transferred an amount of Rs.8,000/- ed another amount of Rs.5,000/- as refunded by the caller. He further 00 respectively. On 22.07.2025, he ho while showing that his car had old him to pay another amount of lan. Feeling suspicion, he sent an e- ics Company and came to know that ,0008/- by some fraudster. After gs were initiated. The accused Lalit ffered a disclosure statement on the nominated as an accused. He was presence was secured by issuance of errogation, he too suffered disclosure e crime and got recovered the car sed was also arrested on the basis of stands concluded and challan stands l for the petitioner that he has been s of disclosure statement of the co- ed upon him. The co-accused Lalit nefit on bail by the Trial Court. On . He is on bail in another case of g of - as rther 5, he had nt of - that After Lalit n the was ce of sure e car is of tands been - Lalit . On se of AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.03 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-67950- similar nature as r to be released on b 4. Status State counsel. It allegations agains offender. There ar extended benefit o deserve to be relea 5. This both the parties. 6. The p cheated the comp Rs.45,008/- and t allegations make however, he is no take considerable No useful purpos anymore. It is we not be a replica of is an exception. circumstances, th case for grant of b ordered to be relea -2025 (O&M) 3 re as registered against him. It is, the d on bail. Status report and custody certificate el. It is vehemently argued by learne against the petitioner which are seriou here are chances of his committing sim nefit of bail. It is, therefore, stresse e released on bail. This Court has heard the rival subm The petitioner in connivance with the complainant and thereby causing and taking away the vehicle belong make out prima facie a case for com is now in custody for a period of ab rable time to conclude as even charge purpose would be served by detaini t is well settled proposition of law tha lica of post-conviction sentence and th tion. Taking into consideration th es, this Court is of the opinion that nt of bail. Accordingly, the petition is e released on bail subject to his furnis is, therefore, argued that he deserves tificate have been filed by learned learned State counsel that there are serious in nature. He is a habitual ing similar offences or absconding, if stressed that the petitioner does not l submissions made by counsel for ith the co-accused is alleged to have using loss to him to the tune of belonging to the complainant. The or commission of subject offences, of about 05 months. The trial will charges have not been framed so far. detaining the petitioner in custody aw that pre-trial incarceration should and that even bail is the rule and jail ion the above discussed facts and that the petitioner has made out a ition is allowed and the petitioner is furnishing personal as well as surety erves rned e are itual ng, if s not l for have e of The nces, will far. tody ould d jail and out a er is urety AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.03 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-67950- bonds to the ext Court/Chief Judici 7. It is cla as an expression o influence the outco 8. Since any, is rendered in 02.02.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 4 e extent of 02 sureties to the sati Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate c t is clarified that the observations mad sion of opinion of this Court on the m e outcome of the trial in any manner. Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous.
(MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
e satisfaction of the learned trial trate concerned. s made above shall not be construed the merits of the case and shall not nner. een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
trial trued ll not n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.03 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.