PUNDLIK DIGAMBAR CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
APPLN/3603/2024 · 2025-09-09
Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24798 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24798 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17-appln-3663-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 17 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3603 OF 2024 PUNDLIK DIGAMBAR CHOUDHARY VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. V. V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. P. S. Patil, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. B. N. Gadegaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 09 SEPTEMBER 2025
ORDER : . Learned APP places on record the communication from the investigating officer to him dated 09.09.2025 stating that upon investigation, it has been found that sufficient evidence against the applicant has not been found and, therefore, he has filed ‘A’ summary before the Trial Court on 21.08.2025 and it is pending.
2. Now, the Trial Court would take further procedure as contemplated under law when ‘A’ summary has been filed. Under such circumstance, the application stands disposed of with liberty to the applicant to approach this Court as and when occasion arises.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [1] 2025:BHC-AUG:24054-DB