2025:HHC:781 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 14697 of 2024 Decided on : 04.01.2025 Madan Lal. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has directly approached this Court without firstly making a representation to the employer vis-à-vis the reliefs being claimed in the petition, as prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation to the respondent-Department vis-à-vis the issues raised in the present petition. 2. In the event of any such representation being filed within 3 weeks’, let appropriate decision thereupon be 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:781 taken by the competent Authority, within 8 weeks’ as from the date of the receipt thereof. The issue of delay and latches may also be gone into, by the Authority concerned, as prayed for by learned Additional Advocate General. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 04, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)