KHALID HAMID AND ORS. v. SHEIKH.M.AHMED,SECY.HIGHER EDUC.AND ORS.
CPSW/367/2014 · 2025-07-18
Ma Chowdhary
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2479 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2479 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 367/2014 in SWP No. 1775/2014
Khalid Hamid & Ors.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Sheikh. M. Ahmed & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Nirmal Kotwal, AC vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (18.07.2025)
Despite indicating the name of the counsel for the petitioners in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and so was the case on the previous date of hearing as well. It appears that the order sought to be enforced may have been implemented to the satisfaction of the petitioners, as such, petitioners remains unrepresented. Be that as it may, the instant contempt petition is disposed of and the proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek revival/restoration of the petition, in case, cause survives.
(M A CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
Jammu 18.07.2025 Renu
Serial No. 13 Renu Bala 2025.07.19 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document