- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17676 CRL.A No. 912 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 912 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHIKKA OBLAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS D/O DODDA OBALIAH R/O RAMLINGAPURA VILLAGE BUKKAPATTANA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-- 572115 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BASAWA PRASAD KUNALE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SIRA POLICE STATION REPRESENTED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560001 2. SRI. SATYANARAYANA S/O KAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI. DEVAKUMARA S/O DYAMANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 4. SRI. NAGRAJU S/O ERANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17676 CRL.A No. 912 of 2025 5. SRI. SHIVANNA S/O NOT AWARE AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 6. SRI. NARESH S/O HANUMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 7. SRI. NAGARAJU S/O THADAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 8. SRI. BASAVARAJU S/O YARAGUNTAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 9. SRI. SRIRANGAPPA S/O DURGAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 10. SRI. ROWDY HANUMANTHAPPA S/O GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 11. SRI. NAGAIAH S/O HANUMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT RAMLINGAPURA BUKKAPATTANA HOBLI SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT KARNATAKA-572115 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODA, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(1) OF THE SC AND ST (POA) ACT, 1973 PRAYING SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11/02/2025 IN CR.NO.309/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMKUR, DISMISSING THE PROTEST PETITION FILE BY THE APPELLANT - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17676 CRL.A No. 912 of 2025 AND TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO CONDUCT FURTHER INVESTIGATION WITH RESPECT TO CR.NO.309/2021. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant files memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal and liberty to file appropriate appeal. Hence, the counsel is permitted to withdraw the appeal. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. The Registry is directed to return the certified copies to the appellant. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17