2025:HHC:378 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 14877 of 2024 Decided on : 03.01.2025 Satish and others. …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that interest of justice would be served in case the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file independent representations with further direction to the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:378 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioners filing independent representations, with regard to the issues raised in the writ petition, within a period of 3 weeks from today, let the same be decided, within a period of 8 weeks’ as from the date of receipt thereof and in terms of the averments contained therein. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 03, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)