- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1194 WP No. 9399 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 9399 OF 2021 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, 109-128, 2ND STAGE, GAYATHRIPURAM, MYSORE- 570 019. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VANITHA.K.R., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BASAVA BHAVAN, HIGH GROUNDS, BANGALORE- 560 001. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 1542/F, C AND D BLOCK, ANIKETANA ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGARA, MYSURU- 570 022. BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. DODDE GOWDA S/O LATE KARI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT SREE NILAYA, WARD NO.2, CHIRNAHALLI ROAD, K.R.NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-577 201. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1194 WP No. 9399 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 13.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20