Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 15525 of 2021 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. At the very outset, Sri Dharmendra Kumar Shukla holding brief of Sri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not inclined to press the instant writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Mrs. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel for the Development Authority have no objection.
2. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed in terms of the aforesaid. September 26, 2025 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sr. Advocate, Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C., Ramendra Pratap Singh (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt.Kiran Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad