Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24768 (RAJ)

BIRBAL RAM YADAV SON OF LATE SHRI SUGNA RAM YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/4687/2023 · 2025-04-09

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15864] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4687/2023 Birbal Ram Yadav Son Of Late Shri Sugna Ram Yadav, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Sirohi, Neem Ka Thana, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Gokul Chand Yadav Son Of Shri Ramniwas Yadav, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Dhani Maalsagar , Tan Sirohi, Tehsl Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.M.S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Shubham Saini, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 09/04/2025 1. This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed, with a prayer to quash the FIR No.256/2023 registered at Police Station Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar for offences under Sections 143, 447, 427, 506 of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated be- tween the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties amicably. 3. Heard and considered. 4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and [2025:RJ-JP:15864] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4687/2023] Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced below: “12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the na- ture of the offence and the fact that parties have amica- bly settled their dispute and the victim has willingly con- sented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable.” 5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record. 6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscel- laneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 256/2023 registered at Police Station Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar for offences under Sections 143, 447, 427, 506 of IPC with all consequential proceed- ings, are hereby quashed and set aside. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /275