- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17640-DB RERA.A No. 31 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF RERA APPEAL NO.31 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LTD. FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 REP. BY MRS. SHAILAJA M.G. (SENIOR MANAGER- LEGAL) AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 40/43, 4TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, SADASHIV NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 080. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. J. P. DARSHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, HAVING OFFICE AT: 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. Digitally signed by PRAJWAL A Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17640-DB RERA.A No. 31 of 2025 2. MR. SHEELA JHA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O PREM, SHANKAR JHA, RESIDING AT 16-A, RAI GOPAL SARKAR LANE, NAYA BAZAR, BHAGALPUR BIHAR – 812 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DEEPAK BHASKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS RERA.APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT 2016, R/W SEC.100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN APPEAL NO. (K- REAT)27/2023 BEFORE THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 18.02.2025 PASSED IN APPEAL (K.REAT) 27/2023 CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 04.11.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AUTHORITY IN CMP/210830/0008283. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 25.04.2025 for withdrawal of the appeal. The same reads as under: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17640-DB RERA.A No. 31 of 2025 “MEMO The undersigned counsel for the appellant- Authority prays that this Hon’ble Court may be please to permit the appellant to withdraw the above appeal and accordingly dismiss the appeal as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending application(s), if any, are disposed of as infructuous. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26