Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24766 (AP)

Awari Bujju Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23245/2020 · 2025-08-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010349932020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23245/2020 Between: 1. AWARI BUJJU BABU, S/O, SRINIVASULU,R/O, FLAT NO 201, LAKSHMI MANASA APARTMENTS, PARAMESWARI NAGAR, NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DT., 2. AVVARI TULASI, W/O, BUJJU BABU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE R/O, FLAT NO 201, LAKSHMI MANASA APARTMENTS, PARAMESWARI NAGAR, NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DT., ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS HOME SECREATARY SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI. 2. SUPERINDENTENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DT.,NELLORE 3. DY SUPERINDENTENT OF POLICE, KAVALI SUB DIVISION, KAVALI SPSR NELLORE DT., 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAVALI RURAL POLICE STATION,KAVALI SPSR NELLORE DT., 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KAVALI RURAL POLICE STATION,KAVALI SPSR NELLORE DT. 6. SRI AKKESWARA RAO, S/O, NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS PRESENTLY WORKING AS CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AT KAVALI RURAL POLICE STATION,KAVALI SPSR NELLORE DT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents in calling the petitioners to the police station and harass the petitioners with out any cause as bad,arbitrary and voilation of fundamental right guaranteed under article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not harass the petitioners and their family members and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not harass the petitioners and their family members pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents in calling the petitioners to the police station and harass the petitioners without any cause as bad,arbitrary and voilation of fundamental right guaranteed under article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not harass the petitioners and their family members and to pass....” 2. None represented for the petitioners. 3. On earlier occasion also there is no representation for the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. As the petitioners are not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.08.2025 MH HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 79 W.P.No.23245 of 2020 Dt.06.08.2025 MH