1 2025:CGHC:28124 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4237 of 2025 1 - Parmeshwar Deshlahre @ Pranav @ Monu S/o Chelaram Deshlahre Aged About 20 Years R/o New Krishanagar, Near Pump House, Supela, Bhilai, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) Presently R/o Chouhan Greel Valley Colony, Block No. A-2, Forth Floor, Quarter No. 14, Junwani, Police Chowki Smriti Nagar, P.S. Supela, Distt.- Durg (C.G.). ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer (S.H.O.) P.S.- Rajim, Distt.- Gariyaband (C.G.). ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Ashutosh Biswas, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 26 / 0 6 / 202 5 1. The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 393/2024 registered at Police Station – Rajim, District – Gariyaband (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.06.26 17:28:13 +0530 2 Sections 137(2), 87 & 64(2)(M) of B.N.S. and Sections 4(2) & 6 of POCSO Act. 2. As per the prosecution’s case, it is alleged that on the date of the incident i.e. 30.11.2024, the applicant took the victim along with him and on the pretext of marriage, committed sexual intercourse with her. Based on this, offence has been registered against the present applicant. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He next submits that there is no objection of the victim to grant of bail to the applicant, and the applicant is in jail since 06.12.2024, and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in the near future, therefore, the present applicant may be released on bail. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the victim was recovered from the house of the applicant and in the MLC report fact of the sexual intercourse has come. He also submits that the applicant committed a heinous offence with a minor girl of 15 years' age; therefore, at this stage, he may not be enlarged on bail. 5. The victim along with her brother, appeared through video conferencing from the concerned DLSA and raised no objection to grant bail to the applicant. 3 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the material available on record, the evidence collected by the prosecution against the applicant and the nature of crime, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, is rejected. 8. However, the concerned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and to ensure that the trial is concluded as expeditiously as possible. 9. Office is directed to sent a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu