APHC010349962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17894/2025 Between: MEDISETTI SESHA RAO, S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.DOOR NO.23-4-12/1, PITANI VARI VEEDHI, SEELAM VARI SAVARAM RAMACHANDRAPURAM TOWN AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMACHANDRAPURAM POLICE STATION, A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARI KRISHNA TATA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 in not registering FIR, pursuant to the Petitioner's complaint dated 02.07.2025 and the Respondent No.4 in not taking any action pursuant to the Representation dated 02.07.2025, as illegal, arbitrary 2 and unconstitutional and further direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to consider the Petitioner's Complaint and Representation and take action accordingly.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, the matter is purely related to civil issues and the Police never interfere with the civil issues. 3. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder: “It is further submitted that, as the matter is purely related to the civil issues. The Respondent police never interfere with the civil issues, unless there is any specific direction from the Hon'ble Court further the Respondent police advised both the parties settle the matter before the competent civil court.” 4. Sri T.Hari Krishna, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the same the petition may be disposed of. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:21.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17894 of 2025 Dt.21.07.2025 Dinesh