20-IA-7009-25 IN ITXAL.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7009 OF 2025 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 20912 OF 2025 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 Mumbai … Applicant Versus Ankur Agrawal ...Respondents _______ Ms. Shilpa Goel, for Applicant. _______ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ. DATE: 31 JULY 2026 P.C. 1. We have heard Mr. Goel, learned counsel for the applicant. Respondents though served not appeared. Affidavit of Service is already filed. 2. By this interim application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 28 days caused in filing the aforesaid appeal under the provisions of Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. We have perused the averments as made in the application, which make out a sufficient case for the delay to be condoned. Also, there is no written opposition placed on record on behalf of the respondent to this application, although an oral opposition. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, and in the interest of justice, the application deserves to be allowed. It is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Mane JYOTI RAJESH MANE Digitally signed by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2026.08.03 12:57:42 +0530 20-IA-7009-25 IN ITXAL.DOC 5. Office objections, if any, be removed within a period of eight weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Mane