Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24751 (GAU)

ASHAT ULLAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/2708/2024 · 2025-11-30

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010101452024 2025:GAU-AS:16431 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2708/2024 ASHAT ULLAH SON OF ALLAL UDDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHITALMARI PATHER, P.O. SUTIRPAR, P.S. JURIA, IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, PIN- 782124 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING HENGRABARI GUWAHATI- 781036 3:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING UPPER ASSAM ZONE NAGAON 4:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING NAGAON CIRCLE NAGAON ASSAM 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING NAGAON DIVISION NAGAON Page No.# 2/2 6:PUB KALADUBA PANI JUGAN ACHONIR PORICHALONA COMMITTE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDNT MD. A. JALIL SON OF LATE ABDUL HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PUB KALADUBA P.O.-BORALIMARI DIST.- NAGAON ASSAM PIN-78212 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A DEKA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P H E, MR M H CHOUDHURY (R6),MS. A BEGUM (R6),MR. M A SHEIKH (R6) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 01-12-2025 Heard Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner, who fairly submits that the writ petition may not be maintainable in view of the fact that the grievance is against the action of a committee constituted under a particular scheme, which would not be an instrumentality of the State. Therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. Mr. R. R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, PHE and Ms. A. Begum, learned counsel for respondent No. 6, are present. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant